The Rum DiaryReviewed by: Julia Webster Extremely Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience:
Adults
Genre:
Romance Politics Adaptation Drama
Length:
1 hr. 50 min.
Year of Release:
2011
USA Release:
October 28, 2011 (wide—2,100+ theaters)
DVD: February 14, 2012
Relevant Issues
alcoholic / drunkenness experimenting with psychedelic drug sin and the fall of man What wages of sin are evident in this film? Immoral sex
PURITY—Should I save sex for marriage? Answer My boyfriend wants to have sex. I don’t want to lose him. What should I do? Answer How can I deal with temptations? Answer What are the consequences of sexual immorality? Answer Immorality
integrity versus corrupt hotel development scheme How do I know what is right from wrong? Answer Are we living in a moral Stone Age? Answer
“Absolutely nothing in moderation.” As I prepared to write this review, I found that Johnny Depp’s latest outing, “The Rum Diary,” had less and less to recommend it. The film opens with a scene in a horribly disheveled hotel room, where Depp’s character, Kemp, has completely destroyed the room because he couldn’t get the mini-fridge to open. Kemp himself is unkempt, with swollen, bloodshot eyes. Though the audience laughs at Depp’s drunken antics, so reminiscent of his wobbly portrayal of Captain Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean, we should be reminded…
Kemp is in Puerto Rico during the 1960s, at a time of great political unrest in Puerto Rico, to interview for a job with a failing newspaper. He ends up with the job, writing human interest stories and the daily horoscope. The audience watches Kemp consult an astrology guide for his column. “The Rum Diary” doesn’t have much of a story to tell, as it is about a series of unappealing, foul-mouthed characters in a somewhat tedious, uninteresting plot. For example, a physically wasted Giovanni Ribisi plays the newspaper’s crime and religious affairs reporter. He spouts such words of wisdom as: “Humans are the only animal who claim a God and then don’t believe in Him.” Ribisi provides the characters with most of their drugs and alcohol, including rum made from squeezing the filters stolen from a nearby rum factory and some kind of psychedelic drug that comes in the form of eye drops. Aaron Eckhart plays Sanderson, the “bad guy,” who convinces Kemp to write advertising for a large hotel he plans to build on a nearby deserted island. While Sanderson shows Kemp the layout of the new hotel, explosions can be heard in the background, as the U.S. performs nuclear bombing tests on another deserted island. Sanderson tells Kemp, “The rainforest is God’s idea of money.” Kemp is interested in the money he can make on the project, as he sees the luxury living Sanderson obviously displays. Here we should remember that…
Kemp is also attracted to Eckhart’s girlfriend, Chenault, played with Barbie-like beauty by Amber Heard (“Drive Angry,“ “Never Back Down,” “Zombieland”).
As the plot limps along, Kemp is stricken by his conscience as he sees the horrible poverty of Puerto Rico, and he and his friends decide they will fight for the rights of the “little guy.” Their crusade is not very profound, nor is their heroism very impressive, as it consists of an attempt to save the dying newspaper, as if it will somehow be the salvation of the downtrodden Puerto Ricans. (The Bible reminds us that salvation comes from God, “Everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved” —Joel 2:32.) Nearly every scene in “The Rum Diary” is filmed against a backdrop of gray, cloudy sky and bleak, empty ocean. The settings sum up the feeling and quality of the movie: gray and bleak. As a viewer, I found I was most interested in what trouble the characters would get into next, as a result of their low moral character, heavy drinking, and drug use. The scenes of comedic violence and absurd antics held my attention, like the morbid fascination of staring at a gruesome accident on the highway.
“The Rum Diary” is just plain not worth seeing. Violence: Moderate / Profanity: Extreme (“G_d”—6; “Chr_st”—5; “J_sus”—3; f-words—29; etc.) / Sex/Nudity: Heavy Are we living in a moral Stone Age? Answer See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers. Sorry, no other viewer comments received yet. If you have seen this movie and would like to share your observations and insights with others to be posted here, please contact us! |
The one high point was when he was thinking for a lobster and said, “humans are the only creature with a God, yet the only creature to act like there isn’t one” (paraphrase mine). The language was very rough and the Lord’s name was used in vain often. It was, in a sense, a story about fallen man. Some nudity, and sexual innuendo. A correct story of an unsaved society and the wages of sin.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4½
—Unclebones, age 58 (USA)