Today’s Prayer Focus
MOVIE REVIEW

Speed 2: Cruise Control

Reviewed by: Ken James
STAFF WRITER

Moral Rating: Average
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience: Teens Adults
Genre: Action Adventure
Length: 123 min.
Year of Release: 1997
USA Release:
Featuring Sandra Bullock, Jason Patric, Willem Dafoe, Temeura Morrison, Tim Conway
Director Jan De Bont
Producer
Distributor
Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. Trademark logo.
20th Century Studios
, a subsidiary of The Walt Disney Studios, a division of The Walt Disney Company

Something’s wrong with “Cruise Control”. The speed is there, but it sure is a bumpy ride.

Sandra Bullock is back again as Annie Porter, an innocent lovable all-American romantic girl tied up in an out-of-control ride. Sound familiar? If you’re hoping for a smash hit similar to the original “Speed”, sorry to disappoint you, but this sea-sick thrill ride lacks much of the great innocence that was refreshingly found in the original.

So, does something seem a little less sinister and scary when we move from a rocketing bus rigged to explode, dodging motorists in downtown L.A., to a luxury cruise liner set on a collision course with an island in the Bahamas?

At least Bullock is the same quick-witted brunette that we have come to know and love in the original “Speed”, “The Net”, and “While You Were Sleeping”. Who is her romantic sidekick for this journey? Not Keanu Reeves. Maybe their relationship forged in disaster didn’t make the long-haul. This time it’s L.A.P.D. swat team member Alex Shaw (Jason Patric). He’s much too serious and stone-faced in my opinion, but “intriguing” at the same time.

The deranged lunatic, John Geiger (masterfully performed by Willem Dafoe) is a mentally, emotionally, and physically ill ex-employee of the cruise liner business royally ticked off for being fired as an on-board computer designer. He has a big problem with forgiveness and holds some major grudges against the industry. He should have heeded the advice given throughout the most popular book ever sold (the Bible) and forgiven those who he felt wronged against. But instead, he decides to take control of nearly every action the cruise ship makes with his portable high-tech computerized devices. His short term plans also contain setting off a bunch of bombs, stealing a multi-million dollar jewelry collection, killing some people, then escaping before the cruise liner runs into an oil tanker or an island, whichever comes first. Pretty full day, wouldn’t you say? Yes, he’s a genuis with a purpose. But rest assured that chainsaw-wielding while cocktail-dress wearing Annie and her LAPD daredevil boyfriend, Alex (along with the help of the ships skeleton crew) will save the day. The last fifteen minutes of the film are obviously the climax of the film as this huge sea-faring vessel collides with numerous other ships and even a busy tropical port! Now that was worth seeing.

As for “romance”—Alex and Annie are never shown in their “intimate” moments, but with the lingerie she brings aboard and the scenes of the two of them in the same bed, we can safely assume premarital sex is not looked upon as a bad thing. On the positive side, marriage is discussed throughout the film as a “big commitment” and one to not take lightly. About a dozen obscenities or profanities, some hitting one right after the other, are included. Some slightly risque situations are presented with several passengers as they undress (no nudity is shown) to cover some vents in which gas is escaping, and while one attractive woman says she can’t help in that way because she’s “not wearing any underwear.” That’s the tantalizing part of the whole film.

There were several cool accents—Irish, Caribbean, etc. But whatever the deal was with the on-board entertainment in the beginning of the cruise, I do not know. They looked Caribbean and acted Caribbean, but why they were singing in Portuguese?

“Cruise Control” is fast-paced and slightly-romantic, but predictable and lacking luster. Don’t see this if you’re hoping to re-enter the thrill of a ride with the original “Speed.”


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
I thougt the movie was really, really stupid! The original “Speed” was much better. It was way out of christian value also because they went on the trip and had slept together before they were married. Plus, the movie was supposed to be suspenseful… but it wasn't!
Samantha, age 12
…I am a huge Sandra Bullock fan, but even still this movie didn’t deserve 3 stars…
Brian Pedigo, age 17
Since I have not seen this movie, I will not critique its quality. However, it seems to me like I’m not the only one who thinks “Speed” was nice but never called for a sequel…
Michael C., age 15
“Speed 2” wasn’t bad. It just had no ultraviolent action that we’re used to seeing. Sad to say it, but we’ve grown so accustomed to seeing slow-motion rapid fire gunshots and psychokillers stabbing people with screwdrivers that a little movie about a ship gone wild seems boring. I praise God that I didn’t get to see all that boom-boom for a change.
Chris Utley, age 24
“Speed 2” was a BIG flop. Most all of the movie was corny. What are the odds of flying a plane onto a pole that is sticking out of a ship, surviving, and then getting blown up by the leaking gas—I don’t think so. Unless you don’t care about poorly written scripts, don’t go to “Speed 2”. Sandra Bullock was the only good thing about it.
Brian Pedigo, age 17
This movie was a joke!! I laughed throughout the whole movie, but not because of its humor content, but because it was so silly. The person who REALLY added the comic relief was the ship help with the annoying accent. This guy stole the show! Bullock and Patric are just extras compared to this guy!!! On a more serious note, a non-married couple should not take a cruise together, although nothing was really portrayed between them. In conclusion, if you love actors with bad accents, watch this movie… I guess the effects were pretty good, too!
Milo, age 22
“Speed 2” should’ve been called SLOW… 2 SLOW! It dragged big time. The special effects were neat, but the audience wanted more than that! Unrealistic is the theme for this movie. A huge cruise ship crashing into a crowded dock with virtually no one getting hurt?? A cruise ship side-swiping a tanker doesn’t cause any major problems, but a small two-seater plane crashing into a tower on the tanker causes it to explode? Annie (Sandra Bullock) being in another “Scenario” and being singled out by the madman? Hmmm… a bit hard to believe.
Tim Emmerich, age 30
I essentially agreed with the “flavor” of the reviewer’s comments. But, I have to say (and I hope I just haven’t become too desensitized to notice) that despite the obvious violent innuendo presented in the film there were only 2 deaths (not too graphic for viewers), a hint of pre-marital sex, a minor “sexy” reference about the lack of underwear and a foul-language “joke” (s-word). Overall I was suprised at the lack of depravity considering this is a “Hollywood” feature.
james jackson, age 33
FYI: Willem Dafoe was the title character in “The Last Temptation of Christ.” And Jason Patric’s prior movie, “Sleepers,” made a joke out of priesthood…
Brian, age 24