  THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAMEReviewed by: Marcus Mann STAFF WRITER
Note: Disney releases are currently being boycotted by many Christians because of their company's pro-homosexual policies. (Featuring the voices of Tom Hulce, Demi Moore, Kevin Kline, Paul Kandel, Tony Jay, Charles Kimbrough, Jason Alexander, Mary Wickes, David Ogden Stiers / Director: Kirk Wise and Gary Trousdale) Disney's animators have done it again. A genuine blockbuster! Spectacular animation, great music and charming characters highlight this adaptation of Victor Hugo's classic tale. Quasimodo (the "hunchback") is a lonely outsider who dreams of leaving the protection of Notre Dame for just one day. He ventures into the city (Paris) during the annual Festival of Fools against the wishes of his master, the self-righteous, evil Judge Frollo. "Topsy-turvy", the song for the celebration, describes very well the rest of the story as Quasimodo's world turns upside down. During the celebration, he is crowned "King of the Fools" and finds himself falling instantly in love with the Gypsy dancer Esmeralda. Joy turns quickly to sorrow as the crowd cruelly mocks and rejects him for his misshapen appearance, failing to see the charm which lies below his odd looks. Back in the safety of the Cathedral, Quasimodo is at first heartbroken to find that Esmeralda is in love with another, yet he ultimately risks everything to bring the two lovers together. In the end, the entire city of Paris owes Quasimodo a great debt as he teaches the people the important lesson of acceptance and love. Paris learns to appreciate the unique values of the outcast Gypsies and the disfigured hunchback. As Christians, we find this to be an admirable lesson. The Bible teaches that all the people in the world are the miraculous creation of God (in God's own image) no matter the color of skin or the standard of beauty. Gratefully, Disney's adaptation of the novel makes the great Cathedral, and it's priest, the protector and sanctuary of the mistreated; rather than an evil oppressor. Disney erects a clearly evil judge as the villain, making it easy for the entire audience to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. The major weakness of this film lies in it's portrayal of evil judge Follo's lust for Esmeralda. The scenes which deal with this topic are intense, dark and definitely adult in nature. If indeed this film were intended for younger children (as the toy marketing would indicate) then Disney has sadly missed the mark. This aspect of the movie is the only shadow for an otherwise bright film experience. The Hunchback of Notre Dame is easily the best Disney animation since Beauty and Beast. Older children, teenagers and adults will thrill to the adventures of this likable bell-ringer, but parents may want to preview it before taking their younger kids. Year of Release — 1996
[ If our reviews have been helpful to you, please prayerfully consider a donation to help pay the expenses for making this service available to you and your family! Donations are tax-deductible. ] 
Jeff Stucker, age 30 I am terribly disappointed… How can Disney in good conscience market this movie to children? It is obviously an adult film with adult themes. (Adding a few talking gargoyles and a cute goat does NOT, in any way, make this movie suitable for children.) It is filled with violence. The opening scene depicts a mother being killed as her child is ripped from her arms ...then the child almost being murdered because of his deformities. ...My twins, who are 8, were terrified and had nightmares following this movie. I am no prude and have no problem with the content (for adults)... I have a problem that they (have targeted) this movie to youngsters. Had I previewed it, I wouldn't have taken my children. As an adult, I can appreciate the lush animation, but as a parent I was embarrassed and distressed at the dark and lustful undertones. ...Has Disney forgotten "The Little Mermaid" and "Beauty and the Beast"? I believe they need to take a serious look at their filmaking and marketing policies and remember who their audience is... CHILDREN. Overall, great movie. Best animation I've EVER seen! Breathtaking! The song that Esmeralda sings (something about "Children of God" is surprisingly a great one! You could sing it at church, and unless they've seen the movie, they won't know it's not a Christian song. My complaint, however, is that Esmeralda, like Barbie dolls, puts an unrealistic pressure on girls to look like her. Her measurements are way out of proportion, and it puts up a standard of thin, voluptuous bodies, screaming "sex", that most of us never achieve. The low cut dress is very inappropriate! The scene about the King's burning desire for her, and how she will burn in hell if she doesn't give in it his lusts is extremely inappropriate for children. Our kids are pretty sensitive to scary scenes, so here are my comments about when to cover their eyes! When the bad guy is in front of his fireplace, it's mildly scary and unedifying. When the hunchback and the captain go down into the gypsy hideout, beware--they go through a sewer area lined with skeletons (this was the worst of the scenes). Lastly, the ending part was a bit intense with the bad guy trying to kill the good ones. This film sends confused religious messages: the priest is a great guy, but the gypsy sings about hypocrisy, and the people are praying selfish prayers. This seemed to go right over our 7- and 4-year olds' heads though. Great theme: a monster is what you are inside, not out. I took my 8 and 12 year olds to this movie
and they both did not think it was as good
as The Lion King. I did not like the
dark, evil lustfulness of the judge.
I also found the anti-religious undertones
not appealing. I am tired of Disney's
portrayal of women as sexy objects and
always falling under the spell of men repulsive.
I don't want my daughters to believe this
Hollywood image of relationships. What happened
to the Disney movies of my childhood? Luv Bug anyone? I must say I agree about that, while I greatly enjoyed the movie I would not
take a young child to it. Not only the kicking in the head, but when they were going to torch the families house with the family in it - as well as a few other scenes. There were 4 kids in front of us at the theater (maybe
between 4 and 6) and they were not paying much attention to the movie - they were very antsy, as were some other kids. I definitely think a movie like
Toy Story is more directed towards kids and also more captivating for them (and adults too). I think all the carping about the film's suitability for tykes should be levelled - not at Disney Feature Animation - but at the MPAA for rating it "G". I even have some confusion about how a movie that begins with a guy killing a woman by kicking her in the head - how that movie gets a G rating. I think the movie was really good.
There was some bad things in there that I didn't like, like the time that the bad guy killed the hunchbacks mom. I thought it was a good movie, but sad in places. The music was pretty good.
I did not find it scary, and I would recommend it to kids to see with their parents. ...As a Christian I think the subject matter was treated well, but, I think the Disney violence is getting a little meaner every movie. This bad guy in this movie was especially cruel. I don't think I would recommend this for any kids under age 10... This film is a composite of all recent Disney films since MERMAID, with the usual perky, independent, Belle/Jasmine/Pocahontas-type of heroine. It has all the routine elements of HOME ALONE, including violence and silly slapstick wise cracking sidekicks. It is not for kids (I'd like to hear parents explain the song HELLFIRE to their children). Despite the fact that the MPAA should have given this film a 'PG' rating - Disney has totally outdone themselves. I said in 1991 they'd never top Beauty and the Beast - I was wrong. This film is top notch - and as for the comments on seances and alternative lifestyles...what movie were you watching? It wasn't the same one I was watching, that is for sure. On a scale of 1-100 it gets a 98 My wife took my two sons (13 and 9) to see it. She said it was much too Hollywood in spiritual terms. Seances and alternative lifestyle compassion were prevalent. Would not recommend for children. I thought it was a great Disney adaptation of Hugo's classic. My 10 year old really loved it and my 14 year old thought it was a great love story. Good movie, but it seems to be geared toward an adult audience. I wouldn't recommend it for children. I really enjoyed the music. |
