Prayer Focus
Click here to watch THE HOPE on-line!
MOVIE REVIEW

Why Him? also known as “Dlaczego on?,” “Miksi hän?,” “Miért pont ő? ,” “Perché proprio lui?,” “Porquê Ele?,” “Tinha Que Ser Ele?,” “Zašto baš on?,” “¿Por qué él?”

MPAA Rating: R-Rating (MPAA) for strong language and sexual material throughout.

Reviewed by: Gabriel Mohler
CONTRIBUTOR

Extremely Offensive
Add to your list?
View My Movie List
Moviemaking Quality:

Primary Audience:
Adults
Genre:
Comedy
Length:
1 hr. 51 min.
Year of Release:
2016
USA Release:
December 23, 2016 (wide—2,916 theaters)
DVD: March 28, 2017
Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation click photos to ENLARGE Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Relevant Issues
Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

rivalry between a father and boyfriend

Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

fornication and sin in the Bible

LUST—What does the Bible say about it? Answer

PURITY—Should I save sex for marriage? Answer

CONSEQUENCES—What are the consequences of sexual immorality? Answer


TRUE LOVE—What is true love and how do you know when you have found it? Answer

Sex, Love and Relationships
Learn how to make your love the best it can be. Discover biblical answers to questions about sex, marriage, sexual addictions, and more.
Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Copyright, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Featuring: James FrancoLaird Mayhew
Zoey Deutch … Stephanie Fleming
Bryan CranstonNed Fleming
Megan Mullally … Barb Fleming
Griffin Gluck … Scotty Fleming
Tangie Ambrose … Patty Dunne
Cedric the Entertainer … Lou Dunne
See all »
Director: John Hamburg—“I Love You, Man” (2009), “Along Came Polly” (2004)
Producer: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Red Hour Films
See all »
Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

“Of all the guys his daughter could have chosen…”

I don’t know if all reviewers face this dilemma, or if it’s just me, but sometimes I have to question my motives for reviewing movies. When I saw the trailer for “Why Him?”, I was thrilled at the thought of Bryan Cranston and James Franco playing the father vs. boyfriend duet. But it was obvious the film was going to be rated R for language and, more importantly, sexual content; so I knew I probably shouldn’t watch it. When the thought came to my mind that I could review it, I sternly questioned whether I wanted to review it for the right reasons.

I opted not to review it while it was in theaters. I was hoping that maybe someone else would review it, so I could read the review and know just how much offensive content was in it. But that didn’t happen, so I went ahead and took it upon myself to watch this film and write the review you’re reading now.

In my defense, I didn’t expect the film to be this crude. I did read a few other reviews before watching it, and learned that there was no graphic sex or nudity. So I figured it couldn’t really be that bad, right? Maybe just too much language and an occasional explicit wisecrack? Sigh. I can’t believe I’m still that naive after all the movies I’ve reviewed.

The plot is summed up quite well in the clever title. A girl takes her family to meet her boyfriend, and her boyfriend is an eccentric sleaze. The acting was not disappointing; Cranston and Franco are absolutely PERFECT in their roles, and all the other actors give fantastic performances as well. Another thing that impressed me was the cinematography and scenery. That’s a thing that’s often overlooked in comedies, but it was very well-done in this film and gave me something to enjoy—to make the film more bearable.

It’s true, the film has no graphic sex scenes or explicit nudity. The only nudity is a scene of James Franco’s butt, in an only somewhat sexual situation. There is a scene where sex occurs, but very little is shown. But what the film lacks in pornographic visuals, it makes up for in disgusting dialog. The amount and degree of filthy dialog in this film is simply insane. I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say I think there was foul talk in every single scene. When I say it’s constant, I literally mean almost non-stop. And when I say literally… I mean literally! It’s so sexually descriptive I don’t know how the actors could even perform without blushing. And by the way, the aforementioned scene with sex involves the girl and the boyfriend having sex on a table while the father is hiding under it, and the horrified look on his face is played for laughs.

To be fair, I do know there are several truly funny moments in this film that made me laugh. But… I can’t remember what any of them were. The only memorable humor in this film is sexual. The only other humor I remember is a scene where a character tries to figure out how to use a new kind of toilet, which I guess was kind of funny, but that scene went too far, as well.

The language is about what you’d expect—just under 100 f-words (several used with mother), 30 misuses of God’s names, and countless crass words for body parts. On a positive note, the boyfriend’s constant swearing is portrayed as bad. Everyone—the girl, her family, and even his household servants—tell him he should stop swearing so much, and he concedes that he should try to stop. But I don’t remember him ever actually stopping, and it would be nice if the movie had taken its own advice!

There are some forced positive messages at the end. We learn that, despite his nasty lifestyle, the boyfriend is committed to being honest with his girlfriend’s parents, and he will not propose to her without her father’s permission. Both the boyfriend and the father also realize, at the end, that they’ve been selfish, and that it’s ultimately her decision to make. But this ends up being overshadowed by the flip side of that, which is that the girl’s family learns from the boyfriend to be more open to his bad behavior.

There’s probably a lot that I’ve missed. But even half of the content described above should be enough to keep believers from watching it. In my opinion, a good alternative is “Meet the Parents.” Be sure to read our review of that, too, because it certainly has its crude moments, but the crude moments stay in the background while the screwball humor wins hearts. Either way, I strongly urge all viewers to stay as far away from “Why Him?” as is humanly possible.

Violence: Mild / Profanity: Extreme / Sex/Nudity: Extreme

See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers.


Viewer CommentsSend your comments
Negative
Negative—I have often thought that the R-rating for movies indicated the use of an occasional f-word. The preview of this movie indicated it was to be a comedy, not something more foul-mouthed than anything I have seen before. My wife and I left before it was over and asked the theater manager why the movie previews didn’t give a hint that it was going to be extremely filthy. There should something above the R-rating, possibly an F.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 2
Richard Lalonde, age 73 (USA)
Negative—I always use this site to preview movies; this time I did not, and boy did I regret it. After viewing this movie, I rushed to post this comment. I wanted to save others from wasting their time or money. The F-word was used constantly throughout the movie, a lot of foul humor, and a lot of sinful sexual behavior. I want to warn parents DO NOT take your children to see this movie, half of the audience was children between 5-15. I really couldn’t think of one redeeming thing about this movie. If you do choose to see this film, be prepared to take a shower afterward.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 2
Scott, age 45 (USA)
Movie Critics
…wildly entertaining jaunt… ribald, gross-out humor…
Bruce DeMara, Toronto Star Newspapers
…moderately entertaining…[3/5]
Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian (UK)
…clichéd… charmless, largely laughless… [2/5]
Guy Lodge, Time Out Syndney
…“Why Him?” will make you ask “Why This Movie?”… [C]
Adam Graham, The Detroit News
…The first scene of “Why Him?” tells you exactly what you’re in for. A young woman named Stephanie (Zoey Deutch) speaks via video chat to her older boyfriend, Laird (James Franco). Their banter goes from flirty to dirty, as Laird riffs on how horny he is and Stephanie coos reassuringly, “I’ll see your almost-black balls later” (yes, you read that right). Then, like an exclamation point, a sudden flash of Laird’s pubic hair—and we’re off on a 111-minute marathon of slangy idioms and expletives, gross-out gags and unbridled raunch, some of it funny, much of it merely strenuous. …
Jon Frosch, The Hollywood Reporter
…composed almost entirely of Squirm Factor humor. …The “Squirm Factor” happens, say, when a prospective son-in-law is so lacking in his ability to be conversationally appropriate with his future in-laws that he repeatedly makes flattering and boastful remarks about their young daughter’s sexual skills and attractiveness. …And it’s just nine minutes short of two hours. That’s a lot of squirming. …
Michael Heaton, The Plain Dealer
…he’s a doof with no filter, and his mansion is stocked with preposterous works of art, most of which depict animals fornicating (there’s also an aquarium with a dead moose suspended in its own urine). …
Owen Gleiberman, Variety
…The film wants to be a comedy of excess, but it just feels excessive… You want toilet jokes? You got them. Dozens!
Darren Franich, Entertainment Weekly
…a steady stream of obscenities and gross-out gags that make the humor in “Bad Santa 2” seem tame by comparison… Bryan Cranston’s too good for these old comedy tropes…
Alan Zilberman, The Washington Post
…this film is trite, crass and moronic… shoveling expletives into the holes where jokes ought to be… slapping Mr. Franco’s scenery-eating grin on any old drivel doesn’t guarantee entertainment…
Jeannette Catsoulis, The New York Times
…not funny, not funny, not funny, not funny, not funny… in the bottom 1% of movies I’ve ever seen
Richard Roeper, Chicago Sun-Time

PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted here.