Wolf CreekExtremely Offensive
Moviemaking Quality:
Primary Audience:
Adults
Genre:
Adventure, Crime, Horror, Thriller
Length:
1 hr. 39 min.
Year of Release:
2005
USA Release:
December 25, 2005 (wide); US DVD release: April 11, 2006
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Relevant Issues
Every time you buy a movie ticket or rent a video you are casting a vote telling Hollywood “That’s what I want.” Why does Hollywood continue to promote immoral programming? Are YOU part of the problem? How does viewing violence in movies affect the family? Answer
“The thrill is in the hunt.”
See list of Relevant Issues—questions-and-answers. Negative—This was the worst movie I think I had ever seen in my entire life. …Parents do not let your kids watch this; it is very bloody, a ton of f*** words in it along with other swear words. Violence was bad; not bad stupid.…
Extremely Offensive / 2 —Kaleb Thomas, age 18 Movie Critics
…baldly exploitative… rivals The Devil’s Rejects as the vilest, most depraved depiction of subhuman behavior in a 2005 film…
—Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Ed Blank …has a creepily realistic, documentary shooting style that will remind some horror aficionados of the original “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”.…
—St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Joe Williams …at least as unnerving as it is gratuitously sadistic, skin deep, and full of plot holes the size of Ayers Rock…
—Boston Globe, Janice Page …full of horror and sadism… “Wolf Creek” becomes exactly the kind of despoiling element the movie otherwise rails against…
—Newsday, John Anderson …I guess some people out there will want to spend Christmas Day watching a spinal cord get severed by an 18-inch Bowie knife. Unfortunately, theyll have to make it through about an hours worth of nausea-inducing hand-held photography to get there.…
—The Boston Phoenix, Peter Keough |
There were some things to like about this film, but they were all overshadowed by the sheer sadism of the movie. It would have been different if there had been some character development. Some, not all, of the characters seemed to be one-dimensional. The scenery was beautiful, and the director of this film has a gift at creating the atmosphere required for this film. The slow pace of the film actually adds to the tension later on. Like I said, there was a lot to like about this film, but it was torture to watch at times. If you must go, go with caution.
My Ratings: Extremely Offensive / 3
—Adam, age 23