Movie Review

EQUILIBRIUM

MPAA Rating: R for for violence

Reviewed by: Megan Basham
CONTRIBUTOR

Average
Moviemaking Quality:

Primary Audience:
Teens Adults
Genre:
Sci-Fi/Thriller
Length:
1 hr. 47 min.

Starring: Christian Bale, Sean Bean, Taye Diggs, Emily Watson, William Fichtner | Directed by: Kurt Wimmer | Produced by: Jan DeBont, Lucas Foster | Written by: Kurt Wimmer | Distributor: Dimension Films

With little to look forward to in terms of major releases until “Lord of the Rings”, my husband and I decided to take a risk with a low-budget sci-fi flick, “Equilibrium”. Every once in a while, venturing into the daunting world of indie film (usually characterized by we’re-so-much-cooler-and-smarter-than-you ennui) can actually pay off. And I have to admit, it certainly did in this case.

Set in the near future in the dictatorship of Librium, mankind discovers that intense emotions like jealousy and rage are the true enemy—causing people to wage war and commit murder. So in the interest of creating a peaceful, anesthetized utopia, a new world order is established requiring everyone to deaden such feelings with the government issued drug, Prozium.

Naturally there are resistors—renegade art and music lovers who refuse to take their medicine and realize that suppressing anger and hatred also suppresses love and joy. Charged with rooting out these “sense-offenders” is an elite fighting squad, the clerics. And the most elite of this elite team is cleric John Preston (Christian Bale), a soldier so committed to the cause, he doesn’t even flinch when his wife is arrested and executed. In fact, Preston remains steadfast until his partner reveals himself as a poetry-reading traitor and a providential Prozium accident allows him to experience his own God-given emotion.

To be fair, Equilibrium’s heavy-handed plot sometimes contradicts itself, and the preposterous “Matrix”-esque gun battles drag on a little too long for my taste. However, the performances and a few of the action sequences, (particularly a pitch-black showdown near the beginning) are brilliant, and there was something about this Orwellian tale that roused my deepest beliefs.

One of the timeliest themes in this film is the idea that peace at any cost can be as evil and violent as war. And that not all anger—for example, righteous anger—is wrong. Maybe it’s just me, but during the whole film, I couldn’t help but think of the crowd of mockers on programs like “Saturday Night Live” and Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show.” Sophisticated scoffers who find the phrase “axis of evil” (indeed the very idea of evil) a source of cynical humor and insist that bothering to overthrow a murdering, raping regime couldn’t be anything more than a political ploy. If this film argues anything, its that power-mad dictators will resort to anything to maintain the people’s allegiance.

Oh, and of course there are all the implications of hinging a story on an emotion-hindering drug called Prozium. Without getting too deep into the debate, “Equilibrium” seems to question the excessive practice of giving overly energetic kids and despondent adults medication that could impede their natural, and needed, emotion. I have no way of knowing the filmmaker’s actual intent, but his story definitely made me consider some of the philosophical questions of our day—quite an extraordinary thing for a movie these days.

Year of Release—2002

Viewer Comments
Positive—Equilibrium so far has been my favorite movie of the year. I cannot understand why they did not hype this one like so many other action flicks this year… Maybe it was because this one didn’t have a lot of Anti-Christian values. This film has a lot going for it, a good moral, good acting, great action, almost no cussing (I think that there was only two very small instances of cussing, but I have seen kids cartoons that said worse). This film rocked! I have seen a lot of dirty trash on the TV and big screen that I would not dare let a kid see, but this one I think is fit for teenagers on up. There is some mild violence, but nothing that you cannot see on a family night viewing of the network channels. This is a must see movie!
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 3½]
—Michael Whitt, age 29
Positive—This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a while… if you don’t mind getting “mental.” Although some of the elements of the script aren’t original in nature, the gun-fighting choreography was very unique and impressive. Christian Bale does an excellent and convincing job as the central character. The movie is rated “R,” but happens to be cleaner than 99% of the PG-13 flicks these days… no cursing, no sex. The movie is violent but not in a gory way… the use of blood is minimal. The content, setting, themes, messages and unique action make the movie a good one!
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 4½]
—Chris Kelley, age 28
Positive—My favorite movie of the year, and arguably of all time. An incredible combination of deep character development and extreme action makes for a strong combination that should be enjoyed by any sci-fi fan with a taste for an intellectual storyline. Christian Bale could easily take Keanu Reeves any day. A definite must see. [Better than Average / 5]
—Jason Cook, age 20
Comments from young people
Positive—Equilibrium is the best movie I have ever seen. Most people I know don’t want to see it because there’s no big name actors, but even though it lacks big name actors it still has great acting and a great story/plot. And from a christian point of view there is nothing that is offensive towards god. It was pretty violent but violence is what makes a movie exciting. I would recommend this movie to anyone…
My Ratings: [Better than Average / 5]
—Noah Berman, age 13
Neutral—I loved this movie. It was great. The plot was cool, but the special fx weren’t as good as other stuff. I really need to point out the underlying perspective of it, a perspective that the reviewer DID NOT catch. I’m sad to bash this flick because I loved it. It was great. Good gun battles, fun explosions… But, here’s my argument. The main character, John Preston, is what is called a CLERIC. He works for “The Father” in a society that is ruled BY Father. Father is portrayed as a bad character near the end; someone who makes everyone behave horribly. Now, if you’ve seen this movie, Father was capable of basically mind control. I’m only explaining one perspective of this movie. I think the producers wanted to show us the “evil” of God. So, Father is evil. The Clerics (another word for PASTOR, remember?) are evil. The only non-evil is when John breaks free and kills “Father”, who actually is a lie. There is no Father; he died earlier. So even Father is a fake. This sounds like a bash on Christianity. Say what you want; I think this flick has more than one viewpoint and at least one of them are bad.
My Ratings: Average / 3
—Garrett DeRossett, age 15